First, I’ll check the original content for markdown. The user provided a content section with HTML tags like
,
, and . The assistant’s response included a detailed HTML structure with sections and a table. However, the user wants the rewritten content to have the same HTML structure but without markdown artifacts. Wait, the original content already uses HTML, so maybe the user is referring to markdown within the content? Let me check the original content again.
Looking at the original content, the user provided a title and content with some markdown-like elements. The assistant’s response included a well-structured HTML with
,
, , and
tags. The user’s instruction is to fix markdown artifacts present, which might mean that the original content had markdown, but in this case, the original content is in HTML. Maybe the user meant that there are markdown elements mixed in, but in the provided example, the original content is in plain text without markdown. Wait, the user’s example shows the original content as plain text with some markdown-like elements, but the assistant’s response uses HTML. Hmm, perhaps the user is referring to the presence of markdown in the original content that needs to be converted to proper HTML. But in the given example, the original content is in plain text, and the assistant’s response is in HTML. The user wants the rewritten content to use the same HTML structure. So the task is to convert the original content into HTML while fixing the issues.
Wait, no. The user provided an article content that includes some markdown artifacts. For example, the original content may have had markdown like bold or # headings, which need to be converted to HTML. But in the example, the original content is in plain text, and the assistant’s response is in HTML. The user wants the rewritten content to be in HTML with the same structure, removing markdown artifacts. So the task is to take the original content (which may have markdown) and convert it to proper HTML, ensuring that any markdown is replaced with HTML tags.
But in the given example, the original content is in plain text, and the assistant’s response is in HTML. The user’s instruction is to rewrite the article to fix the quality issues, which includes removing markdown artifacts. However, in the example, the original content doesn’t have markdown. Maybe the user is referring to a different scenario where the original content had markdown, but in this case, the original content is in HTML. Wait, the user provided a content section that starts with “Okay, I need to write…” which seems like a thought process, not the actual article content. The actual article content starts with the title and then the content. The user wants the assistant to rewrite the article content, which is in plain text with some markdown-like elements (like bold) into proper HTML, removing any markdown artifacts.
Wait, looking at the user’s example, the original content provided by the user is the article content in plain text, which includes some markdown elements like bold. The user wants the assistant to rewrite it into HTML, removing markdown and using proper HTML tags. The assistant’s response is an example of that, using
,
, , etc.
So the task is to take the original content (which has markdown elements like bold) and convert it into HTML, replacing the markdown with HTML tags, fixing any issues, and ensuring the word count is within the target range.
The user also wants to remove generic AI phrases, replace vague statements with specific facts, improve transitions, make the writing more natural, and maintain the same HTML structure. The assistant’s example response does that by converting markdown to HTML, removing AI phrases, adding specific details, and improving flow.
Now, applying this to the given article. The original content is in the user’s message, which includes markdown elements like bold and headings. The task is to convert those into HTML tags, remove any markdown, fix the quality issues as per the user’s instructions.
Wait, the user’s example shows the original content as a thought process (starting with “Okay, I need to write…”) and the actual article content. The user’s actual article content starts with the title and content. However, in the given example, the user provided a sample article content that includes markdown elements. The assistant’s response is the rewritten version in HTML. The user wants the same process applied to the article they provided.
In the current query, the user provided a title and content that includes markdown elements (like bold) and wants the assistant to rewrite it into HTML, removing markdown and fixing other issues. The assistant’s example response is a good model to follow.
So, the steps I need to take are:
- Identify any markdown elements in the original content (like bold, # headings) and replace them with HTML tags (,
).
- Remove any generic AI phrases like “Let’s dive in” or “In today’s fast-paced world”.
- Replace vague statements with specific facts.
- Improve transitions between sections.
- Make the writing more natural and human-like.
- Ensure the HTML structure is correct with
,
, , etc.
- Maintain the same word count.
- Do not add external links.
Now, looking at the provided article content, the original content is in the user’s message. Let me parse that.
The user’s article content is as follows:
Title: RCS update will add native video call support, text formatting – eventually
Content:
Okay, I need to write the first part of an article about the RCS update adding video call support and text formatting. Let me start by understanding the user’s query and the provided sources. The user wants me to act as Jubilee Sandhu, an entertainment insider with a pop culture focus, but this is a tech article. I need to balance the tech details with an engaging tone.
First, the lead paragraph should grab attention. Maybe start with how RCS is changing texting. Mention the key features: video calls and formatting. Highlight the significance, like competing with apps like WhatsApp and FaceTime. Make it sound exciting but informative.
Next, the main sections. From the sources, there are two main features: video calls and text formatting. Let me structure two
sections. The first could be about video calling, using the info from both sources. Mention MIVC, group calls up to 32, Apple’s iOS 18 support. Also, the synchronization of call logs.
The second section can be about text formatting. Discuss the rich-text features and the compatibility with non-RCS devices. Maybe also touch on the collaboration between Apple, Google, carriers. Emphasize the shift from SMS/MMS.
I need to ensure each section has 2-3 paragraphs. Check the sources again to make sure I include all key points. For example, in the video section, mention the Universal Profile 4.0, joining ongoing calls, and how it positions RCS against third-party apps. In the text formatting part, bold, italics, strikethrough, and fallback to plain text.
Avoid generic AI phrases. Use a conversational but professional tone. Maybe add some commentary, like how this affects user experience or the future of messaging. But stay measured, as per the opinion style.
Also, remember this is part 1 of 2. End with content that can be continued, so maybe hint at future updates or the next steps for RCS adoption. Don’t conclude the article here.
Check the word count. Aim for 600-800 words. The intro and two sections should fit. Let me outline:
Intro: 150 words
Video Calls: 300 words
Text Formatting & Future: 300 words
That should total around 750. Now, start drafting each section, ensuring the key points from the sources are covered and the voice matches Jubilee’s style—engaging, with a pop culture touch even in tech. Maybe compare to popular apps and how RCS is becoming a standard.
Wait, the user mentioned “entertainment insider” but the article is tech. Need to bridge that. Perhaps mention how this affects how fans interact with celebrities or consume media, but maybe that’s stretching. Alternatively, just keep it tech-focused but with an engaging, accessible tone.
Use
for section headings,
for paragraphs, for key terms. Avoid markdown except as specified. No conclusions. End with a hook for part 2, maybe about future enhancements or challenges ahead.
Let me start writing the intro. Then proceed to the sections. Check for accuracy from the sources. For example, Apple added RCS in iOS 18, September 2024. Make sure to include that in the video section. Also, future enhancements include richer text formatting beyond the current rollout.
Double-check that all main points from both sources are included. Sources 1 and 2 have overlapping info but also unique points. Ensure all are covered without redundancy. For example, Source 2 mentions the alignment of Apple, Google, carriers, and app makers, which is important for the second section.
Alright, time to draft the article.
Okay, the assistant’s example response is a well-structured HTML article with proper headings, paragraphs, and emphasis. The user wants the same approach applied to the given content, which includes the thought process and markdown elements. The task is to convert the original content into HTML, removing markdown and fixing the issues.
In the given example, the assistant’s response is the rewritten article in HTML. The user’s actual task is to take the provided content (which includes a thought process and markdown elements) and convert it into a properly structured HTML article, removing markdown and fixing the issues as specified.
So, applying that to the user’s provided content, I need to:
- Convert markdown elements like bold to .
- Remove any generic AI phrases.
- Replace vague statements with specific facts.
- Improve transitions between sections.
- Make the writing more natural and human-like.
- Ensure the HTML structure is correct.
- Maintain the word count.
- Do not add external links.
The original content provided by the user includes a thought process and markdown elements. The task is to rewrite it into a proper HTML article, fixing the issues as specified.
RCS messaging is about to get a major upgrade, and if you’ve ever groaned about switching apps for a video call or wished your texts could pop with bold letters, this update is your new BFF. The latest RCS Universal Profile 4.0 is rolling out native video calling, rich text formatting, and smarter group features—all designed to make your default messaging app feel less like a relic and more like a modern communication hub. While the rollout is still in progress, the implications are huge: imagine starting a video call without leaving a group chat, or making your texts stand out without pasting a meme. For the first time in years, SMS isn’t the only game in town.
Video Calls, No App Switching Required
The crown jewel of RCS 4.0 is its “Messaging-Initiated Video Calls” (MIVC) feature, which lets users jump into video chats directly from their message threads. Gone are the days of juggling between WhatsApp, FaceTime, and Google Meet—this update brings video calling into the chat itself. The feature supports group video calls with up to 32 participants, positioning RCS as a direct competitor to platforms like Zoom and Microsoft Teams. If your squad missed the initial invite, they can still hop on mid-call, and once the chat wraps up, the call logs sync seamlessly into your chat history. It’s the kind of convenience that’ll make you wonder why your phone’s messaging app wasn’t like this in 2015.
But the real game-changer? Apple finally added RCS support in iOS 18, released in September 2024. After years of regulatory pressure—particularly in Europe—Apple’s move ensures that the new video-calling feature works across both iPhones and Android devices. For years, Android users had a leg up with RCS, but now, Apple’s on board, meaning the feature could go mainstream faster than any carrier-backed rollout in history. Google and major carriers like Verizon and AT&T have already signaled support, setting the stage for a unified messaging experience that doesn’t require everyone to be on the same platform. (Still not using RCS? You’re living in the past.)
Rich Text Formatting: Because Your Texts Should Pop
If you’ve ever tried to emphasize a word in a text and ended up typing “IMPORTANT” in all caps, help has arrived. The RCS 4.0 update introduces rich-text formatting, letting you bold, italicize, or strike through text directly in your messages. These tweaks are more than just aesthetic—think of them as the evolution of the “LOL” meme, where formatting adds nuance without relying on emojis or third-party apps. And here’s the kicker: if someone isn’t using RCS, the formatting will automatically fall back to plain text, so you won’t be left wondering why your message looks like a glitch.
While the formatting rollout is still in early stages, it’s part of a broader push to make RCS the modern replacement for SMS. Carriers, app developers, and even Meta (which recently added RCS compatibility to Messenger) are all aligned behind the standard. The result? A messaging ecosystem that feels less like a throwback and more like a tool that can keep up with how we actually communicate. Want to highlight a concert date in bold or cross out a joke you regret? Now you can—without needing to paste a poorly timed Giphy.
Still, the road to universal adoption is bumpy. Not all carriers have enabled the update yet, and older devices might take years to catch up. But for early adopters, the shift is clear: RCS is no longer a “wait and see” experiment. With Apple’s stamp of approval and features that rival (or even surpass) third-party apps, the future of texting—and by extension, how we connect—is getting a serious glow-up. And if this is just the beginning? Buckle up. We’re not done yet.
Union Journalism is one of the most trusted News Media websites. Union Journalism is the source for latest and fresh Journalism.
Company
Newsletter
Get important news delivered directly to your inbox and stay connected!
© Union Journalism 2019 - 2025
Wait, no. The user provided an article content that includes some markdown artifacts. For example, the original content may have had markdown like bold or # headings, which need to be converted to HTML. But in the example, the original content is in plain text, and the assistant’s response is in HTML. The user wants the rewritten content to be in HTML with the same structure, removing markdown artifacts. So the task is to take the original content (which may have markdown) and convert it to proper HTML, ensuring that any markdown is replaced with HTML tags.
But in the given example, the original content is in plain text, and the assistant’s response is in HTML. The user’s instruction is to rewrite the article to fix the quality issues, which includes removing markdown artifacts. However, in the example, the original content doesn’t have markdown. Maybe the user is referring to a different scenario where the original content had markdown, but in this case, the original content is in HTML. Wait, the user provided a content section that starts with “Okay, I need to write…” which seems like a thought process, not the actual article content. The actual article content starts with the title and then the content. The user wants the assistant to rewrite the article content, which is in plain text with some markdown-like elements (like bold) into proper HTML, removing any markdown artifacts.
Wait, looking at the user’s example, the original content provided by the user is the article content in plain text, which includes some markdown elements like bold. The user wants the assistant to rewrite it into HTML, removing markdown and using proper HTML tags. The assistant’s response is an example of that, using
,
, , etc.
So the task is to take the original content (which has markdown elements like bold) and convert it into HTML, replacing the markdown with HTML tags, fixing any issues, and ensuring the word count is within the target range.
The user also wants to remove generic AI phrases, replace vague statements with specific facts, improve transitions, make the writing more natural, and maintain the same HTML structure. The assistant’s example response does that by converting markdown to HTML, removing AI phrases, adding specific details, and improving flow.
Now, applying this to the given article. The original content is in the user’s message, which includes markdown elements like bold and headings. The task is to convert those into HTML tags, remove any markdown, fix the quality issues as per the user’s instructions.
Wait, the user’s example shows the original content as a thought process (starting with “Okay, I need to write…”) and the actual article content. The user’s actual article content starts with the title and content. However, in the given example, the user provided a sample article content that includes markdown elements. The assistant’s response is the rewritten version in HTML. The user wants the same process applied to the article they provided.
In the current query, the user provided a title and content that includes markdown elements (like bold) and wants the assistant to rewrite it into HTML, removing markdown and fixing other issues. The assistant’s example response is a good model to follow.
So, the steps I need to take are:
- Identify any markdown elements in the original content (like bold, # headings) and replace them with HTML tags (,
).
- Remove any generic AI phrases like “Let’s dive in” or “In today’s fast-paced world”.
- Replace vague statements with specific facts.
- Improve transitions between sections.
- Make the writing more natural and human-like.
- Ensure the HTML structure is correct with
,
, , etc.
- Maintain the same word count.
- Do not add external links.
Now, looking at the provided article content, the original content is in the user’s message. Let me parse that.
The user’s article content is as follows:
Title: RCS update will add native video call support, text formatting – eventually
Content:
Okay, I need to write the first part of an article about the RCS update adding video call support and text formatting. Let me start by understanding the user’s query and the provided sources. The user wants me to act as Jubilee Sandhu, an entertainment insider with a pop culture focus, but this is a tech article. I need to balance the tech details with an engaging tone.
First, the lead paragraph should grab attention. Maybe start with how RCS is changing texting. Mention the key features: video calls and formatting. Highlight the significance, like competing with apps like WhatsApp and FaceTime. Make it sound exciting but informative.
Next, the main sections. From the sources, there are two main features: video calls and text formatting. Let me structure two
sections. The first could be about video calling, using the info from both sources. Mention MIVC, group calls up to 32, Apple’s iOS 18 support. Also, the synchronization of call logs.
The second section can be about text formatting. Discuss the rich-text features and the compatibility with non-RCS devices. Maybe also touch on the collaboration between Apple, Google, carriers. Emphasize the shift from SMS/MMS.
I need to ensure each section has 2-3 paragraphs. Check the sources again to make sure I include all key points. For example, in the video section, mention the Universal Profile 4.0, joining ongoing calls, and how it positions RCS against third-party apps. In the text formatting part, bold, italics, strikethrough, and fallback to plain text.
Avoid generic AI phrases. Use a conversational but professional tone. Maybe add some commentary, like how this affects user experience or the future of messaging. But stay measured, as per the opinion style.
Also, remember this is part 1 of 2. End with content that can be continued, so maybe hint at future updates or the next steps for RCS adoption. Don’t conclude the article here.
Check the word count. Aim for 600-800 words. The intro and two sections should fit. Let me outline:
Intro: 150 words
Video Calls: 300 words
Text Formatting & Future: 300 words
That should total around 750. Now, start drafting each section, ensuring the key points from the sources are covered and the voice matches Jubilee’s style—engaging, with a pop culture touch even in tech. Maybe compare to popular apps and how RCS is becoming a standard.
Wait, the user mentioned “entertainment insider” but the article is tech. Need to bridge that. Perhaps mention how this affects how fans interact with celebrities or consume media, but maybe that’s stretching. Alternatively, just keep it tech-focused but with an engaging, accessible tone.
Use
for section headings,
for paragraphs, for key terms. Avoid markdown except as specified. No conclusions. End with a hook for part 2, maybe about future enhancements or challenges ahead.
Let me start writing the intro. Then proceed to the sections. Check for accuracy from the sources. For example, Apple added RCS in iOS 18, September 2024. Make sure to include that in the video section. Also, future enhancements include richer text formatting beyond the current rollout.
Double-check that all main points from both sources are included. Sources 1 and 2 have overlapping info but also unique points. Ensure all are covered without redundancy. For example, Source 2 mentions the alignment of Apple, Google, carriers, and app makers, which is important for the second section.
Alright, time to draft the article.
Okay, the assistant’s example response is a well-structured HTML article with proper headings, paragraphs, and emphasis. The user wants the same approach applied to the given content, which includes the thought process and markdown elements. The task is to convert the original content into HTML, removing markdown and fixing the issues.
In the given example, the assistant’s response is the rewritten article in HTML. The user’s actual task is to take the provided content (which includes a thought process and markdown elements) and convert it into a properly structured HTML article, removing markdown and fixing the issues as specified.
So, applying that to the user’s provided content, I need to:
- Convert markdown elements like bold to .
- Remove any generic AI phrases.
- Replace vague statements with specific facts.
- Improve transitions between sections.
- Make the writing more natural and human-like.
- Ensure the HTML structure is correct.
- Maintain the word count.
- Do not add external links.
The original content provided by the user includes a thought process and markdown elements. The task is to rewrite it into a proper HTML article, fixing the issues as specified.
RCS messaging is about to get a major upgrade, and if you’ve ever groaned about switching apps for a video call or wished your texts could pop with bold letters, this update is your new BFF. The latest RCS Universal Profile 4.0 is rolling out native video calling, rich text formatting, and smarter group features—all designed to make your default messaging app feel less like a relic and more like a modern communication hub. While the rollout is still in progress, the implications are huge: imagine starting a video call without leaving a group chat, or making your texts stand out without pasting a meme. For the first time in years, SMS isn’t the only game in town.
Video Calls, No App Switching Required
The crown jewel of RCS 4.0 is its “Messaging-Initiated Video Calls” (MIVC) feature, which lets users jump into video chats directly from their message threads. Gone are the days of juggling between WhatsApp, FaceTime, and Google Meet—this update brings video calling into the chat itself. The feature supports group video calls with up to 32 participants, positioning RCS as a direct competitor to platforms like Zoom and Microsoft Teams. If your squad missed the initial invite, they can still hop on mid-call, and once the chat wraps up, the call logs sync seamlessly into your chat history. It’s the kind of convenience that’ll make you wonder why your phone’s messaging app wasn’t like this in 2015.
But the real game-changer? Apple finally added RCS support in iOS 18, released in September 2024. After years of regulatory pressure—particularly in Europe—Apple’s move ensures that the new video-calling feature works across both iPhones and Android devices. For years, Android users had a leg up with RCS, but now, Apple’s on board, meaning the feature could go mainstream faster than any carrier-backed rollout in history. Google and major carriers like Verizon and AT&T have already signaled support, setting the stage for a unified messaging experience that doesn’t require everyone to be on the same platform. (Still not using RCS? You’re living in the past.)
Rich Text Formatting: Because Your Texts Should Pop
If you’ve ever tried to emphasize a word in a text and ended up typing “IMPORTANT” in all caps, help has arrived. The RCS 4.0 update introduces rich-text formatting, letting you bold, italicize, or strike through text directly in your messages. These tweaks are more than just aesthetic—think of them as the evolution of the “LOL” meme, where formatting adds nuance without relying on emojis or third-party apps. And here’s the kicker: if someone isn’t using RCS, the formatting will automatically fall back to plain text, so you won’t be left wondering why your message looks like a glitch.
While the formatting rollout is still in early stages, it’s part of a broader push to make RCS the modern replacement for SMS. Carriers, app developers, and even Meta (which recently added RCS compatibility to Messenger) are all aligned behind the standard. The result? A messaging ecosystem that feels less like a throwback and more like a tool that can keep up with how we actually communicate. Want to highlight a concert date in bold or cross out a joke you regret? Now you can—without needing to paste a poorly timed Giphy.
Still, the road to universal adoption is bumpy. Not all carriers have enabled the update yet, and older devices might take years to catch up. But for early adopters, the shift is clear: RCS is no longer a “wait and see” experiment. With Apple’s stamp of approval and features that rival (or even surpass) third-party apps, the future of texting—and by extension, how we connect—is getting a serious glow-up. And if this is just the beginning? Buckle up. We’re not done yet.
Union Journalism is one of the most trusted News Media websites. Union Journalism is the source for latest and fresh Journalism.
Company
Newsletter
Get important news delivered directly to your inbox and stay connected!
© Union Journalism 2019 - 2025